10-02-2019, 05:07 PM
The afore mentioned counts and percentages can be discussed, but really, it is an accurate count you can crosscheck.
Because the counts and very very low percentages are the basis and fundaments of my current conclusions,
it would be possible to discuss from that position on forward that
1. It could be established that the scribe made much errors and mistakes, if you are open for it. Then specific textparts need to be discussed.
2. this is only useful if there are mutal agreeable assumptions (read: starting points).
3. And then there is the method used for comparing textparts must be accepted on every end.
Because the counts and very very low percentages are the basis and fundaments of my current conclusions,
it would be possible to discuss from that position on forward that
1. It could be established that the scribe made much errors and mistakes, if you are open for it. Then specific textparts need to be discussed.
2. this is only useful if there are mutal agreeable assumptions (read: starting points).
3. And then there is the method used for comparing textparts must be accepted on every end.