The Impossibility of Double Gallows

[nablator]

I saw these combinations in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. but am not sure whether they should be viewed as “double gallow” or not:

Possible tk in Line 7, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Takahashi Takeshi: “qekar”
René Zandbergen: “q@145;kar”

[...]


Takahashi Takeshi: “q?or”
René Zandbergen: “q[?:e]or”

In this case, the rare character that look similar to characters above, is not before another gallow character.

Maybe relevant, here is one q‘ in a Xth century manuscript (Agobard - De grandine et tonitruis)

   

BNF Latin 2853 f. 95r, line 13: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

 It is transcribed as quia although it is slightly different from the other quia:

   

which are found in Cappelli: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.