11-01-2019, 08:58 PM
(11-01-2019, 04:38 PM)bi3mw wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(11-01-2019, 12:07 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.....I heard that such combinations were often drawn. Does anyone know examples ? I do not mean the doctrine of signatures and corresponding representations, but "compound plants".
It looks like a combination of the water lily from Auslasser with a flower of the regular lily, to show how the VM image might be such a combination as well.
....
I don't know how frequent this is, but it seems to occur in many plants of Trinity O.2.48.
See, for instance, the plant at the top of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (alfugia? scafisem? liur?).
It is described as having leaves like rumex ("lapacium"), flowers like wild sage ("centumgallus") and a root like a swallow ("in modo arundinis").
Compare with images of rumex and sage in Auslasser (he calls rumex "acetosa" and sage "sallfan?").
I hope this helps, because I find the Trinity ms quite hard to read: putting this together took me half a day


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)