07-11-2018, 03:48 PM
Diane!
Mention of some object, event, place, etc. in one's work doesn't have much value for any researcher and scientist, it doesn't promise any progress in a study. Mention itself won't help with deciphering and understanding of a subject, as you know. Therefore you and any other researcher makes conclusions, builds own theory based on own observations and/or of others, comparisons and another needed information.
If any part of a theory or a theory wholy (not an attribute, not a separate object with common definition) is grabbled from yours or anyone's else, then it is a breach and a dishonorable deed. If someone independently suggests a similar theory, but yours was earlier, of course, you can inform that person that your quite similar or the same theory was discribed earlier on the forum or at your blog.
Maybe, I'm not well informed, but I didn't meet anywhere something similar to your theory or suggestion (as you discribed in the previous post above).
As I understand, you closed your blog for that reason that you revised your theory and decided to make some changes there. Maybe, I'm wrong.
So, make progress of your theory, find more evidences, keep trying!
Mention of some object, event, place, etc. in one's work doesn't have much value for any researcher and scientist, it doesn't promise any progress in a study. Mention itself won't help with deciphering and understanding of a subject, as you know. Therefore you and any other researcher makes conclusions, builds own theory based on own observations and/or of others, comparisons and another needed information.
If any part of a theory or a theory wholy (not an attribute, not a separate object with common definition) is grabbled from yours or anyone's else, then it is a breach and a dishonorable deed. If someone independently suggests a similar theory, but yours was earlier, of course, you can inform that person that your quite similar or the same theory was discribed earlier on the forum or at your blog.
Maybe, I'm not well informed, but I didn't meet anywhere something similar to your theory or suggestion (as you discribed in the previous post above).
As I understand, you closed your blog for that reason that you revised your theory and decided to make some changes there. Maybe, I'm wrong.
So, make progress of your theory, find more evidences, keep trying!