06-10-2018, 12:49 PM
They do claim to have decoded small parts of the text, but the logic is not good and there are errors in translation, and their system only partly works and does not generalize to the rest of the manuscript.
They are quite adamant about some of the plant and animal identifications, but the logic for these identifications is not good either.
They spent many years working on it, but it strikes me as hasty and not well supported.
They are quite adamant about some of the plant and animal identifications, but the logic for these identifications is not good either.
They spent many years working on it, but it strikes me as hasty and not well supported.