Unraveling the Voynich Codex

[Koen G]

This book is intellectually unfair in every paragraph I read so far. I randomly selected p.92 where they suggest You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is a hybrid drawing of Psacalium and Pippenalia, where "the artist pained a combined image based on two species mixed together". Then in the very next sentence they say it is "most definitely not" Stolfi's suggestion of Helianthus annuus since some parts don't match the plant. So if Stolfi had said "it's a hybrid image of H. annuus combined with [random plant that explains the leaves]", then it would have been a good counterargument?