(24-07-2018, 09:59 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I guess we all agree that the lower part of Sh is the same as ch? And that the only difference is the 'plume', 'hat', topstroke, whatever you want to call it?
I believe that the "hat" appears (three times, lines 6, 14 and 21) as an individual glyph in the vertical sequence on the left side of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. In the Zandbergen-Landini transcription, it is represented as extended EVA 140.
This could possibly count as evidence for Sh being ch+something (whatever the function of the hat is).


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)