The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $can_link - Line: 6 - File: showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1658 eval




[split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION]
#4
(29-06-2018, 09:58 AM)Wladimir D wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I do not understand why everyone agreed that on the marginalia 17r the first letter of the third word is "L".

Hi Wladimir, Vogt and Schwerdtfeger (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., 2010) mention the possibility that the letter is a B or maybe a K. Personally, I agree with them: L is the most likely candidate, but there are other possibilities. I believe the reading  "lucem" to be uncertain: this is why I added a question mark to it. Anyway, this thread is focused on paralleling the whole Latin alphabet with specific manuscripts. I would like to avoid discussing every single character here: Vogt and Schwerdtfeger have already done that, and I would refer to them and/or to specific threads (e.g. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) for such discussions. Thank you.
[+] 1 user says Thank You to MarcoP for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Matches for the marginalia Latin script - by MarcoP - 29-06-2018, 11:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Matches for the marginalia Latin script [IN OTHER MANUSCRIPTS] MarcoP 57 63,186 03-09-2019, 11:29 AM
Last Post: MarcoP
  [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov ThomasCoon 87 90,407 23-12-2016, 02:09 AM
Last Post: Diane

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)