Mongolian is as interesting as Turkish, in my mind, because of the way the syllables are constructed and combined.
But you cannot get away from one essential fact. In the VMS, certain glyphs come at the beginning, certain glyphs come in the middle and certain glyphs come at the end, with very high frequency. Chinese, Thai, Mongolian, Persian, Korean, Amharic, Latin, French, Lithuanian, Swedish, Sanskrit, English, Welsh, Syrian, finnish, Hebrew, Korean, Spanish, and Armenian (name any other language you like) are not put together that way.
You don't have to be an expert in Chinese to know that there is flexibility in how Chinese syllables are combined, even though there are some systematic rules about how radicals are associated with the main characters... even in this they are nowhere NEAR as rigid as the VMS.
But you cannot get away from one essential fact. In the VMS, certain glyphs come at the beginning, certain glyphs come in the middle and certain glyphs come at the end, with very high frequency. Chinese, Thai, Mongolian, Persian, Korean, Amharic, Latin, French, Lithuanian, Swedish, Sanskrit, English, Welsh, Syrian, finnish, Hebrew, Korean, Spanish, and Armenian (name any other language you like) are not put together that way.
You don't have to be an expert in Chinese to know that there is flexibility in how Chinese syllables are combined, even though there are some systematic rules about how radicals are associated with the main characters... even in this they are nowhere NEAR as rigid as the VMS.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)