[Article] Proposed solution by Gerard Chesire
#22
(09-11-2017, 10:28 PM)Cheshire wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Interesting - in that case you should be more impartial and willing to take a leap of faith that I am correct. That way, you'll know either way by empirical means rather than taking a prior stance.

...
I have dedicated my life to science.


He is asking you to take a leap of faith (a leap of faith is subjective) so that you'll know by empirical means?

That statement is a complete contradiction.



And the part about taking a "prior stance" is a pretty rude thing to say, considering you took time out of your life to read it, to share it with us, and to respond to it. That's a pretty supportive and courteous thing to do that people with a "prior stance" (whatever he means by that) would probably not have followed through on.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Proposed solution by Gerard Chesire - by Koen G - 08-11-2017, 07:59 AM
RE: Proposed solution by Gerard Chesire - by -JKP- - 10-11-2017, 01:41 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Article] Proposed solution by Agnieszka Kałużna & Jacek Syguła davidjackson 7 12,352 16-11-2020, 12:02 PM
Last Post: bi3mw
  [Article] New proposed solution ReneZ 4 11,864 22-10-2017, 04:47 PM
Last Post: voynichbombe

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)