Voynich Manuscript year dated 1111

[stellar]

I have followed your contributions to Stephen Bax' blog, and I noted that in the course of your work, you found several surprising confirmations of your working theory. This confirmed you that you are on the right track.
This is very understandable, and it is happening to many people all the time.

Having seen these confirmations, are you still ready to accept critical comments?
This seems like an offensive question, but believe me, I have had many exchanges with people proposing solutions who were not at all receptive of critical comments.

The biggest problem in what you propose is that in 1111 there was no Uranus. It was only discovered in 1781 and it was only officially named Uranus in 1850.

Dear Rene,

Imagine a sky at night with no lights on the ground that use electricity.  The ancients called Uranos the sky and even identified it as a star.

Uranus had been observed on many occasions before its recognition as a planet, but it was generally mistaken for a star. Possibly the earliest known observation was by Hipparchos, who in 128 BC may have recorded it as a star for his star catalogue that was later incorporated into Ptolemy's Almagest.[18]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.