24-02-2016, 08:47 PM
I have followed your contributions to Stephen Bax' blog, and I noted that in the course of your work, you found several surprising confirmations of your working theory. This confirmed you that you are on the right track.
This is very understandable, and it is happening to many people all the time.
Having seen these confirmations, are you still ready to accept critical comments?
This seems like an offensive question, but believe me, I have had many exchanges with people proposing solutions who were not at all receptive of critical comments.
The biggest problem in what you propose is that in 1111 there was no Uranus. It was only discovered in 1781 and it was only officially named Uranus in 1850.
This is very understandable, and it is happening to many people all the time.
Having seen these confirmations, are you still ready to accept critical comments?
This seems like an offensive question, but believe me, I have had many exchanges with people proposing solutions who were not at all receptive of critical comments.
The biggest problem in what you propose is that in 1111 there was no Uranus. It was only discovered in 1781 and it was only officially named Uranus in 1850.