(17-09-2017, 12:54 AM)Stephen.Bax wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You say you have read my work and you are not interested in building on it - your choice. But a large number of people have discussed it and referenced it. So far my site has had over 500K page views in three years and over 280K unique visits (i.e. different visitors, not including repeats), so it is clear that some are interested. Every week I am asked about my work - yesterday I was invited to contribute to a significant volume being planned for next year, so that keeps me busy enough.
...
That's to be expected when the world's largest news organizations spread the word that the manuscript has been solved. It was a VERY BIG publicity event. It makes the Gibbs furor look like a post-it note in comparison.
It's also expected since there was no VMS forum at the time the announcement hit the news. Some very talented people have contributed the majority of the content on your site.
That Emma is not interested in building on your work I'm sure is based on facts and differences of opinion (which I don't have a problem with), not on page clicks. I'm surprised you would bring up bandwidth as an argument in favor of your theories. Isn't it the ideas that matter rather than the number of clicks?