15-09-2017, 08:15 PM
Whoever made this did not have the intention to produce a faithful copy. They even added correct parallel hatching to the stem, meaning that they were somewhat trained in drawing techniques. All of it has a too modern view to me.
It's either post-Wilfrid Voynich, in which case its value to us is likely limited.
Or it might sit somewhere between Kircher and Voynich, which would make it much more interesting.
The first option feels more likely though...
It's either post-Wilfrid Voynich, in which case its value to us is likely limited.
Or it might sit somewhere between Kircher and Voynich, which would make it much more interesting.
The first option feels more likely though...