Voynich theories and Voynich solutions

[Helmut Winkler]

I dont think there is any use to start an argument with the the nut cases, e.g. when someone gives a Latin text which is not in the least like Latin, either Classical or Medieval, it is a waste of valuable time and resources as I have said in another case a few days ago.

It is no secret that I think some more valid theories are wrong, e.g. the theory that the ms. is a ciphre, but I dont feel qualified to give an opinion which means I keep my trap shut

I think any correct solution will be obvious in itself.

And if someone finds the solution, the satisfaction of cracking the case should be sufficient, even if there is some more worldly remuneration, which is not unlikely