29-07-2017, 02:21 PM
@JKP
What you write is about another question - it's rather about whether the text is meaningful or meaningless.
I'm writing about whether the text is a flow of "language" (be that plain text or enciphered, does not matter) or not. In both cases there may or may not be cross-connections between sections.
Another counter-argument agaist the "synthetic notation" is the number of unique vords ("word types") which is 8114 according to Reddy & Knight (quoted per voynich.nu). Which is not that very low; the whole Shakespeare's vocabulary, for example, consists of only ~29000 word forms (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
What you write is about another question - it's rather about whether the text is meaningful or meaningless.
I'm writing about whether the text is a flow of "language" (be that plain text or enciphered, does not matter) or not. In both cases there may or may not be cross-connections between sections.
Another counter-argument agaist the "synthetic notation" is the number of unique vords ("word types") which is 8114 according to Reddy & Knight (quoted per voynich.nu). Which is not that very low; the whole Shakespeare's vocabulary, for example, consists of only ~29000 word forms (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).