18-07-2017, 04:02 PM
Addendum:
In trying to clean up a Wheel 1 (EVA) transcription, I am having major problems determining the "number of cells" so that
I can align the geometry with the other wheels. 51, of course, works better with 68 (Wheel 3, Wheel 1 + Wheel 2) because it is 3/4 the whole, 24*2, etc. However, 52 (weeks) or 53 does not, and implies that this may not be a code wheel at all. I have combined the H,V, and U transcriptions with my own and Davidsch You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but would like to perhaps come to a conclusion once and for all what the reasonably astute count is for Wheel 1 of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. -- all opinions welcome.
Please note that a) for this, the count is more important than the transcription, but b) the only EVA convention that will
look unfamiliar is the substitution of c`h for sh. This is simply a different way of building the glyphs in a typeface to encompass
different accents. This gives a count of 53 (i.e. not ideal). Also, most references to EVA-k could easily be interpreted to EVA-z, but are listed as EVA-k, which has been the tradition. If any of you have an interest in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and you have 15 minutes...please compare/contrast.
<f57v.R1.1;*>
v.sa.l.y.soeos.vs.ar.okees.o.d.soefchees.l.g.sos.okey.defo.f.o.rkedag.c`h.ofol.sas.ddal.yty.s.y.daiir.otey.dc`hdy.dzals.oty.feheey.a.s.ofaiin.dal.karody.v.s.okeey.darag.qokar.okal.okal.d.o.l.c`hkeal.dydchs.o.k.c`hes.saiin.
In trying to clean up a Wheel 1 (EVA) transcription, I am having major problems determining the "number of cells" so that
I can align the geometry with the other wheels. 51, of course, works better with 68 (Wheel 3, Wheel 1 + Wheel 2) because it is 3/4 the whole, 24*2, etc. However, 52 (weeks) or 53 does not, and implies that this may not be a code wheel at all. I have combined the H,V, and U transcriptions with my own and Davidsch You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but would like to perhaps come to a conclusion once and for all what the reasonably astute count is for Wheel 1 of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. -- all opinions welcome.
Please note that a) for this, the count is more important than the transcription, but b) the only EVA convention that will
look unfamiliar is the substitution of c`h for sh. This is simply a different way of building the glyphs in a typeface to encompass
different accents. This gives a count of 53 (i.e. not ideal). Also, most references to EVA-k could easily be interpreted to EVA-z, but are listed as EVA-k, which has been the tradition. If any of you have an interest in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and you have 15 minutes...please compare/contrast.
<f57v.R1.1;*>
v.sa.l.y.soeos.vs.ar.okees.o.d.soefchees.l.g.sos.okey.defo.f.o.rkedag.c`h.ofol.sas.ddal.yty.s.y.daiir.otey.dc`hdy.dzals.oty.feheey.a.s.ofaiin.dal.karody.v.s.okeey.darag.qokar.okal.okal.d.o.l.c`hkeal.dydchs.o.k.c`hes.saiin.