29-05-2017, 07:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 29-05-2017, 07:05 AM by Wladimir D.)
I think that it's not entirely correct to draw conclusions about the order of writing glyph elements (bench-gallows), since it is probably more was applied text copying. In this case, the clerk can change the order of writing glyph elements (with an external resemblance to the original). And this diverse order is found many times (depending on the amount of ink on pen).
I suppose that we should raise the question of the order of "reading" the ligature (the bench is the gallows).
If you follow the rules of Latin reading, when the superscript (diacritic symbol, in our case, the gallows, apostrophe, point ...) should be read after the symbol above which it is located.
Therefore, my interpretation of the bench with the gallows e — gallows e
Example JKP # 10 e — — t o e '
I suppose that we should raise the question of the order of "reading" the ligature (the bench is the gallows).
If you follow the rules of Latin reading, when the superscript (diacritic symbol, in our case, the gallows, apostrophe, point ...) should be read after the symbol above which it is located.
Therefore, my interpretation of the bench with the gallows e — gallows e
Example JKP # 10 e — — t o e '


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)