10-05-2017, 08:02 AM
There is a very simple explanation for f. 2v and that is that it is showing two different plants touching by accident.The two script blocks look as if they did belong to two different plants as well
The Voynich Ninja
›
Library and Research
›
Codicology and Paleography
[Trinity] Parallels between Voynich and Trinity College MS O.2.48
[Trinity] Parallels between Voynich and Trinity College MS O.2.48
|
[Trinity] Parallels between Voynich and Trinity College MS O.2.48
|
 Member details
Posts: 839 Threads: 8 Thanks Received: 384 in 278 posts Thanks Given: 300 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 3 Location: Franconia, which is Northern Bavaria Country: 
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| [Trinity] General discussion of Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium | MarcoP | 77 | 81,830 |
22-07-2022, 02:08 PM Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com |
|
| [Trinity] Questions about Trinity MS script | Koen G | 57 | 57,994 |
22-05-2017, 11:54 AM Last Post: Koen G |
|
| [Trinity] Plant identification in Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium | Koen G | 83 | 80,838 |
18-05-2017, 04:23 PM Last Post: Diane |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)