[Trinity] General discussion of Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium
#9
I attach a comparison between some scenes in Cambridge Trinity College MS O.2.48 and Florence Plut.73.16 (XIII Century). My impression is that the author of the Cambridge ms was aware of the tradition represented by the Florence ms, but autonomously produced new scenes. Many of the scenes are similar, but none really seems to be an actual copy. The exception is the Mandrake illustration that (like the Thlaspi illustration discussed You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) clearly was copied from a typical Pseudo-Apuleius ms. The plants in the first part of the manuscript seem to be copies from known sources, but the scenes don't.

The illustrations in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are very similar to those in Plut.73.16, so the same considerations apply.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[+] 2 users say Thank You to MarcoP for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium - by MarcoP - 28-04-2017, 10:48 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Trinity] Questions about Trinity MS script Koen G 57 57,930 22-05-2017, 11:54 AM
Last Post: Koen G
  [Trinity] Plant identification in Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium Koen G 83 80,757 18-05-2017, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Diane
  [Trinity] Parallels between Voynich and Trinity College MS O.2.48 Koen G 28 30,779 10-05-2017, 08:18 AM
Last Post: Koen G

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)