Ok Rene, I have to be sure that these pages I mentioned are the only transcribed pages that hold more text than fits on 1 horizontal (standard) page.
I will do a wordcount and check them all again coming days.
----
This is an important observation.
First of all, these are the longest lines available in the manuscript in these pages.
This shows that the line as an entity is more complex than one might think.
If you have any rules on coherency of the words in one line: you can test them on these lines now!
Next, if you do statistical analysis, f.e. counting words per line, lines per page, letters per line
and some of my more recent work: "horizontal and vertical connects" you will see that these pages will pop up with numbers at least twice as high as other numbers.
Because I was only focused on the numbers I did not view the real pages until yesterday.
I am also a bit disappointed that nobody ever noticed this or brought it up, at least I did not read about these facts before anywhere.
I will do a wordcount and check them all again coming days.
----
This is an important observation.
First of all, these are the longest lines available in the manuscript in these pages.
This shows that the line as an entity is more complex than one might think.
If you have any rules on coherency of the words in one line: you can test them on these lines now!
Next, if you do statistical analysis, f.e. counting words per line, lines per page, letters per line
and some of my more recent work: "horizontal and vertical connects" you will see that these pages will pop up with numbers at least twice as high as other numbers.
Because I was only focused on the numbers I did not view the real pages until yesterday.
I am also a bit disappointed that nobody ever noticed this or brought it up, at least I did not read about these facts before anywhere.