08-02-2017, 07:39 PM
During analysis of the text I've located an anomaly
Often this an indication there is something wrong.
It surprised me that after all this time I did not notice it before,
and rather inconvenient, because now I realize many (of my old) statistics are actually false.
The foldouts, have a transcription which is spread along the width of the foldouts !!
f101r1 => the transcript is actually of page f100v + r1 + r2.
By inspection it sounds logical. But it is rather special, having such long lines of text !!
f101v2 => i did not know this is a foldout !! Now You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
tells that f101v2 actually holds the transcript for 101v2 + v1 !!
Since there is no picture of the foldout, I do not know if the text really is 1 long line,
or that actually the text has to be cut up into 2 pages.
Zandbergen writes: "There are 10 lines of text in three paragraphs, all at the bottom of the page. The text crosses the vertical fold between f101v2 and f101v1 and spans the total width of the foldout folio. The last line has been centred, also in the middle of the pair of pages. The fold, which is rather damaged, makes reading of part of the text very difficult."
But, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., tells that
# This page spans two normal-size panels (f101v2 + f101v1) in a
# four-panel fold-out folio. They were originally entered as two
# separate pages (f101v2 and f101v1). However the text and plants
# clearly connect across the joining fold. [Stolfi]
I would like the possible to decide for myself if it is or is not a long line of text.
Unfortunately, I did not find such a picture of the entire stretched foldout.
f89r2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89r2 + r3
f89v2
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89v3 + v2
---
Question to René "so called" Z.: are there more texts which are really long foldout texts?
Often this an indication there is something wrong.
It surprised me that after all this time I did not notice it before,
and rather inconvenient, because now I realize many (of my old) statistics are actually false.
The foldouts, have a transcription which is spread along the width of the foldouts !!
f101r1 => the transcript is actually of page f100v + r1 + r2.
By inspection it sounds logical. But it is rather special, having such long lines of text !!
f101v2 => i did not know this is a foldout !! Now You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
tells that f101v2 actually holds the transcript for 101v2 + v1 !!
Since there is no picture of the foldout, I do not know if the text really is 1 long line,
or that actually the text has to be cut up into 2 pages.
Zandbergen writes: "There are 10 lines of text in three paragraphs, all at the bottom of the page. The text crosses the vertical fold between f101v2 and f101v1 and spans the total width of the foldout folio. The last line has been centred, also in the middle of the pair of pages. The fold, which is rather damaged, makes reading of part of the text very difficult."
But, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., tells that
# This page spans two normal-size panels (f101v2 + f101v1) in a
# four-panel fold-out folio. They were originally entered as two
# separate pages (f101v2 and f101v1). However the text and plants
# clearly connect across the joining fold. [Stolfi]
I would like the possible to decide for myself if it is or is not a long line of text.
Unfortunately, I did not find such a picture of the entire stretched foldout.
f89r2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89r2 + r3
f89v2
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89v3 + v2
---
Question to René "so called" Z.: are there more texts which are really long foldout texts?