Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[ThomasCoon]

The gematria approach has far more possible combinations than any other I have seen mostly consisting of1:1 glyph:letter with anagramming or few additional letters, giving a pool for each word often 5-20 or1 if a longer word. 

In the gematria website that stellar posted, each VMS vord can produce not only 5-20 results but usually 200 results, and Stellar mentioned that he has another source which boosts that number to 300. So each vord can produce 300 different choices - so I can make many tales and there is no common thread between the results.

I am interested in the presented results rather than the method in this case.  Random word sentences such as eg. red offside water, can be disregarded so one would not be looking at 200+ words anymore than 200 random bits from various jigsaws fit together.

 

That's the thing, though: if "red" and "offside" don't fit together, there will be other choices in both columns to complete each word: maybe "red moon" and "the offside [ball]". So it's not as if only one narrative is possible: there are truly 300 choices for word one, 300 choices for word two, etc. making a library of narratives.

I am interested in whether out of this seemingly unlimited word choice sense and particularly fact can be pulled out.  I guess you pulled out a clod war JFK story based on what you know ie. the past, but if JFK, NASA or July did not add up to one of the values what would you have substituted them with to make the narrative?  Was the choice (though out of many) there because it is recorded in the code?  
Bunny

I will be happy to answer these questions, but first I would request an answer for this issue from my last post:

Also, Bunny, I believe you said each paragraph would still have a common thread, regardless of what different "translations" emerged from it. Well, I made a Cold-War story out of the text that stellar translated as the Garden of Eden story. I don't see the commonality but perhaps you can explain.