(31-12-2016, 07:13 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(31-12-2016, 06:15 PM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So you're saying in the post after this one (and in previous posts) that it's okay to anagram letters/glyphs but then implying that it's not okay to anagram words—that they can be considered "random word sentences" and "be disregarded" rather than shuffling them so they make sense the same way you shuffle the letters?
How do you justify this distinction?
Shuffling words - as in sentence order is not quite the same as random word selection, I don't see issue with order rewording in modern language, though I wouldn't personally change the VM word order. I obviously assume that the words are not selected randomly, sometimes regarding known events, sometimes unknown events. I can't speak for how others may view it, logically it is not a sensible approach, but it may yield results. If you assume the words may only be randomly selected without other than coincidental meaning then that's the end of the line of this path.
Bunny
(31-12-2016, 08:39 PM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(31-12-2016, 07:13 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(31-12-2016, 06:15 PM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So you're saying in the post after this one (and in previous posts) that it's okay to anagram letters/glyphs but then implying that it's not okay to anagram words—that they can be considered "random word sentences" and "be disregarded" rather than shuffling them so they make sense the same way you shuffle the letters?
How do you justify this distinction?
Shuffling words - as in sentence order is not quite the same as random word selection, I don't see issue with order rewording in modern language, though I wouldn't personally change the VM word order. I obviously assume that the words are not selected randomly, sometimes regarding known events, sometimes unknown events. I can't speak for how others may view it, logically it is not a sensible approach, but it may yield results. If you assume the words may only be randomly selected without other than coincidental meaning then that's the end of the line of this path.
Bunny
P.S. If you do rearrange a longish sentence of completely random words, eg, get a computer to randomly generate which number word to chose from the list and you can rearrange to make something I would be very interested to see the result.