Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r

[bunny]

No idea if your word could be proven correct or not but they are not nonsensical for a made up demonstration. 

Bunny

They were, though. While going through the 200 choices for each vord, I could've spun the narrative in many directions. Not only true narratives can be created, but fake stories just as easily. This is why there is a problem with this method.

Also, Bunny, I believe you said each paragraph would still have a common thread, regardless of what different "translations" emerged from it. Well, I made a Cold-War story out of the text that stellar translated as the Garden of Eden story. I don't see the commonality but perhaps you can explain.

The gematria approach has far more possible combinations than any other I have seen mostly consisting of1:1 glyph:letter with anagramming or few additional letters, giving a pool for each word often 5-20 or1 if a longer word.  I am interested in the presented results rather than the method in this case.  Random word sentences such as eg. red offside water, can be disregarded so one would not be looking at 200+ words anymore than 200 random bits from various jigsaws fit together.  Stellar (and you) have eventually after a few random examples "spun a narrative", in your own words.  I am interested in whether out of this seemingly unlimited word choice sense and particularly fact can be pulled out.  I guess you pulled out a clod war JFK story based on what you know ie. the past, but if JFK, NASA or July did not add up to one of the values what would you have substituted them with to make the narrative?  Was the choice (though out of many) there because it is recorded in the code?  

There are books which claim to record the future such as Nostradamus and Revelation, and they claim to record what has already been decided prior to the events, 1,000's years in some cases.  The randomness of method may be something I/we don't understand, but if someone can pull factual information as yet unconfirmed, or future events that become confirmed, then despite the method it is not so different.  And yes, history, the present and future is vast so if you could with the "more than stars in the universe" I think it was someone said of word combinations, were able to factually construct a vast array of events from all eras, some of as yet not commonly known or confirmed, or happened, then that would be an interesting outcome to see.  I am not saying this is how it was meant to be read, or that it is the meant solution to reading it, there have been a number of methods that seem to have "crowbarred" results out that are interesting and of a single thread.

Bunny