30-12-2016, 06:41 AM
Jkp and Coon,
Go ahead an dispute as much as you can about my findings; yet I'm coming from a logical premise where numbers are associated to words from the VMS imagery. The letters that are substituted have weight as any cipher, although the Author would have had a great memory or he could read his own script. I don't know how the Author reconciled his understanding of his own cipher to be honest. Maybe he just wished to put all his findings into something that he thought would never be discovered. This is the reason the VMS has never been recognized as a language for the letters that are substituted which are numbers are scrambled, but in some odd way the Author could read it. When I pronounce some words that are in code (meaning the mixed letters) it does have an eerie sound to it like it is Celtic or some druid tongue. Or Old Britain e Runic lingual.
What you guys should be doing is constructive criticisms as if perhaps there is the possibility of an underlying language with the mixed up letters.
for instance below the Author uses 2 different spellings for Calabrease (as in scrambled letters)yet yields the same number 67.
If I pronounce RnRq like RinRaq or like Ren Ra q. Sounds interesting.
And HENTCQ pronounced like Hen Tic Q.
It is quite possible this guy developed his own language solely on Gematria.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Go ahead an dispute as much as you can about my findings; yet I'm coming from a logical premise where numbers are associated to words from the VMS imagery. The letters that are substituted have weight as any cipher, although the Author would have had a great memory or he could read his own script. I don't know how the Author reconciled his understanding of his own cipher to be honest. Maybe he just wished to put all his findings into something that he thought would never be discovered. This is the reason the VMS has never been recognized as a language for the letters that are substituted which are numbers are scrambled, but in some odd way the Author could read it. When I pronounce some words that are in code (meaning the mixed letters) it does have an eerie sound to it like it is Celtic or some druid tongue. Or Old Britain e Runic lingual.
What you guys should be doing is constructive criticisms as if perhaps there is the possibility of an underlying language with the mixed up letters.
for instance below the Author uses 2 different spellings for Calabrease (as in scrambled letters)yet yields the same number 67.
If I pronounce RnRq like RinRaq or like Ren Ra q. Sounds interesting.
And HENTCQ pronounced like Hen Tic Q.
It is quite possible this guy developed his own language solely on Gematria.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
