23-12-2016, 02:23 PM
(23-12-2016, 11:04 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='10159' dateline='1482483932']
But Bunny, the ones who are using questionable methodology ARE coming up with what is conventionally expected. They find plant words in the plant sections, they find water or nymph or healing-related words in the "biological" and pool sections, they find star names in the star sections, and zodiac-related terms in the zodiac-symbol sections.
One doesn't have to invent questionable methodologies or ANY methodology to come up with "solutions" that are plausible.
[/quote]
The thread I mean is not the conventionally expected things. As you say the expected does come up but if for example you look at the late Robert Teague's work aside from the usual astronomy he came up with a bizarre list of country names using an English language approach, which he later converted to a map. Then you have the likes of John Stojko, Newbold and Big Jim. The conventional findings need no explanation, they are as you say expected and not hard to plausibly find, such as the 7 stars which have from the beginning of time been associated with the Pleiades. It's the obscure and seemingly odd results I am interested in and their common thread.
Bunny