(23-12-2016, 10:05 AM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I know few would consider this has anything to do with the correct solution but what if it is right, what if the solution defies what is conventionally expected? I guess we will just keep working on what is a fringe approach. What it yields is not going to be relevant for most people. To boot I think the people the manuscript was actually written for have forgotten how to read their own book.
Bunny
But Bunny, the ones who are using questionable methodology ARE coming up with what is conventionally expected. They find plant words in the plant sections, they find water or nymph or healing-related words in the "biological" and pool sections, they find star names in the star sections, and zodiac-related terms in the zodiac-symbol sections.
One doesn't have to invent questionable methodologies or ANY methodology to come up with "solutions" that are plausible.

