[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#88
Anton has made some important points, imo.

One obvious possibility with regard to that fairly low-brow language is that the later-come writer of this marginalia considered himself socially or culturally 'better' than the person(s) from whom it had been acquired.  Or perhaps it was just pure chagrin at not being able to understand anything in the ms.  Smile

Would the English equivalent not be something like "dam'  bullshit" ? (I add 'damned' because of the protective crosses inserted into the marginalia on f.116v.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by Diane - 23-12-2016, 02:09 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 98 13,297 04-08-2026, 04:34 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,513 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 15 20,509 03-07-2018, 10:25 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)