22-12-2016, 10:38 AM
Stellar, if I were to take a list of the brightest stars and their medieval names and link them through basic logic to the drawings, I would come up with correspondences that are every bit as valid as yours without doing any gematria or deciphering or interpretation of the text at all. Unfortunately, with either method, there would be no way of confirming if the interpretation is correct.
If you really believe your method is valid, it should work as well for text with no images and it should reveal whether there is different grammatical structure to the text in different sections. So far I see no evidence of that.
What you are doing is is using the images to assume the content in the text but you don't really know if the labels are labels or if it's narrative text that's been split up. Those cryptic labels might even be numbers that have been assigned to each star to indicate their brightness (as in astronomy texts) and might not be names at all.
If you really believe your method is valid, it should work as well for text with no images and it should reveal whether there is different grammatical structure to the text in different sections. So far I see no evidence of that.
What you are doing is is using the images to assume the content in the text but you don't really know if the labels are labels or if it's narrative text that's been split up. Those cryptic labels might even be numbers that have been assigned to each star to indicate their brightness (as in astronomy texts) and might not be names at all.