(20-12-2016, 12:18 AM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(19-12-2016, 02:05 AM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There is no way to prove this method Coon yet that does not imply its wrong or right.
Alright, I'll concede that - ultimately there's no way to say this isn't what the writer had in mind, but I think this would be an extremely problematic cipher, and the creator would have discovered that really quick. There are at least 324 paragraphs of "recipes" towards the back of the book, with no pictures. What happens if the author forgets what paragraph 58 says, or 144, or 271, or 310? He literally has to try 200+ entries for the first word and all following words.
I also agree with Koen that Middle English would have to be used.
Maybe he understood his cipher to be a language, but the problem there would be when two VMS vords used the same glyphs with different meanings. Perhaps the glyph may indicate a different word meaning like the 9's with a different descender. Yes some words do have to be reworked to fit middle English, but not many which I have decoded.
This image I'm uploading is part of the Zodiac of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and the words in red do correspond to a Zodiac according to my cipher.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
![[Image: C0E6qs5VQAEoueD.jpg:large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0E6qs5VQAEoueD.jpg:large)
