Posts: 10,541Threads: 432
Member details
Posts: 10,541
Threads: 432
Thanks Received: 4,937 in 2,812 posts
Thanks Given: 4876
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
11
Country:
When were those mountain passes made? What did they look like in medieval times? It might be that they already existed in this shape, but it's an important question to answer if you want to compare medieval artwork to modern photographs.
Posts: 2,661Threads: 132
Member details
Posts: 2,661
Threads: 132
Thanks Received: 306 in 215 posts
Thanks Given: 254
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
-3
Country:
My opinion that the rosettes folio represents an original medieval map of a specific journey and not a copy of a pre-existing map has lead me to rely more a photos of buildings and geographical features than to look for identical illustrations in other medieval manuscripts. Though it is true that I believe that there certainly are some clear parallels with illustrations in other medieval maps and I have spent a lot of time looking at medieval maps.
I definitely believe that the author(s) had seen other medieval maps and I am sure that he/she/they was very influenced by these other works. However, I also believe that the rosettes "map" is an original work relying on the author(s)' own real world observations of buildings and landscapes in addition to the author(s)' imagination and design. I see no reason to believe that the author(s)' would have been incapable of such level of observation and original representation.
My attitude to the rosettes folio is similar to that of the Voynich manuscript as a whole, namely that it is an original work and not a copy of another manuscript. The unique nature of the Voynich manuscript is consistent with it being an original work by an inventive, imaginative and thoughtful author(s)'. So the manuscript is a product of its time, influenced by other contemporary manuscripts and documents whilst at the same moment being an original work with original imaginative and unique features.