22-07-2016, 03:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-10-2016, 07:17 PM by don of tallahassee.)
iiiii
|
f9r
|
|
22-07-2016, 03:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-10-2016, 07:17 PM by don of tallahassee.)
iiiii
22-07-2016, 06:49 PM
![]() Hi Don, Sorry but I can't see your ID in this plant diagram. I always thought the leaves looked a bit like rampant lions. I don't really see the bird head connection, and if so, why four of them in a pinwheel then, and why so deformed most of the time? I can see a bit of resemblance of the leaves of your identified plant but it's problematic that the flowers and root do not match your ID at all. Also I believe that other folios better represent possible geranium species elsewhere in the manuscript,for example f5r, f36r, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I haven't made a final decision on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. yet but I tend toward Steve D's ID of Rumex crispus due to the fact that the flowers/seeds and roots match well and the leaves can somewhat be seen to match in that they are curly. Also the seeds look like lion heads with mane, making a possible connection with the rampant lion, and the plant is certainly rampant in its growth and spread with over 40000 seeds on a plant that can lie dormant for 50 years. Here are some pics to consider for this alternate ID: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
23-07-2016, 10:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-10-2016, 07:18 PM by don of tallahassee.)
iiiii
25-07-2016, 04:43 AM
(23-07-2016, 10:08 PM)don of tallahassee wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Sorry, I don't think your plant ID shows the correct general leaf shape match or red stems, the two major characteristics of the VMS image. I agree that's why I was just going by the ID's I had collected for that page. I'll add yours to consider as well. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|