(07-06-2017, 12:58 PM)Davidsch wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you honestly think, nobody noticed that? You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Yes, that's why I included the following in the opening post:
Quote:This has obviously been noted before
Very little can still be observed about the manuscript that is truly original
What I was hoping for is not an explanation for the shape of the objects, but rather a proposed solution for the similarity between the containers and the towers.
No problem JKP, it seems many cipher related information is limited to US citizens anyway. (blocked, locked etc.)
But if you guys think we, here at Europe, have no other information sources, you underestimate us.
(07-06-2017, 04:10 PM)Davidsch wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.... discussion of a possible solution is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The idea that the jars might represent the elements is interesting. Of course, a major difficulty is that six elements is a strange number. Four is normal, five appears sometimes, but six seems difficult to explain.
The four elements are represented as jars (and personifications) in this engraving from Viridarium chymicum, 1624. I am not aware of earlier examples, but I guess they likely exist.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Reply
The following 1 user says Thank You to MarcoP for this post:1 user says Thank You to MarcoP for this post • VViews
In one version of the Ripley scroll (Bodleian MS Ash Roll 53), there is a structure which presents striking similarities to the central rosette. There are no jars in this one, but in many versions of the scroll, the figures atop the towers are holding flasks.
Interestingly this particular version was discussed in a 2016 talk by none other than Alexandra Marraccini.
Unfortunately, the date of this version is 1600.
Still, I think it is a relevant parallel, because the number of "towers" varies regularly (4, 6, or 7) in different versions, so if this is the basis for the Voynich image, it could be based on an early version I don't know about.
Nice frog and nude figures too
Reply
The following 3 users say Thank You to VViews for this post:3 users say Thank You to VViews for this post • MarcoP, ReneZ, RobGea