13-09-2018, 06:33 PM
(11-09-2018, 10:24 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I've been calling it a wedding scene just to give it a name, but it became clear to me that many illustrators were themselves confused about what was supposed to be going on.
It is likely that the exact significance of the scene didn't matter for the person who drew it in the VM. I'm just hoping we'll be able to find out with more precision where exactly the image came from.
I agree that the specific meaning (if any) is not terribly relevant: we know that the two male twins were first transformed into Adam and Eve and later in courtly lovers. More common lovers' postures appear in other zodiac cycles, but we are lucky the VMS includes something as rare as the "double hand-shake" you noticed and investigated.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. seems relevant to the subject. Among the images they present, possibly the most interesting is the one from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival, Hagenau, Diebold Lauber, 1443‒1446). It fits well with one of the lines of investigation you have opened. If google translate gets it right, the posture (which is just somehow close to a double-handshake, at best) "symbolizes the reciprocity of [the lovers'] bond". This meaning agrees with the double exchange of rings in the French manuscript, but it doesn't seem too appropriate for the paragraph of the De Amore illustrated by the engraving.
(11-09-2018, 10:24 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If I'm not mistaken, your mid-14th century French example is the earliest one found of a proper crossed arms image. In the VM the arms are still crossed, but in Alsace they became uncrossed. However, in the Alsatian examples the style, colors, clothing and details are close to the VM.
It seems unlikely that the VM illustrator re-crossed the arms. Hmm..
I agree. The French Machaut illustration pre-dates the Augsburg "De Amore" engraving by about 130 years: unless their similarity is coincidental (and I don't think it is) there must be evidence of the transmission of this visual motif through time and space.
According to the snippets I can read of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by K. Andersen-Wyman, "most of the extant manuscripts are fifteenth century and German." It is possible that some of them are illustrated and that the 1482 engraving by Anton Sorg derives from a German manuscript, but the only Capellanus ms I have found so far (the Italian BAV Barb. Lat. 4086 mentioned above) isn't.