stellar > 20-10-2016, 07:09 AM
Anton > 20-10-2016, 02:24 PM
EllieV > 20-10-2016, 06:54 PM
Koen G > 20-10-2016, 07:38 PM
sidanno > 20-10-2016, 08:42 PM
(20-10-2016, 07:09 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not sure about her decoding method yet the imagery makes sense to the use of a microscope. To me You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. does represent a woman's fertility organs. I'm going to see if my numerology can make sense of it
stellar > 24-10-2016, 07:37 PM
(20-10-2016, 06:54 PM)EllieV Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi Stellar,Elliev,
I can't comment on your numerology - I'll leave that to folks who understand that kind of stuff.
Regarding the image - my first impression was that it represents the shoulder joints in human anatomy.
However, many people independently see in it the ovaries and the Fallopian tubes. If the wisdom of the crowd is correct - this points to some problems with the 15th century origin of the drawings (the parchment still can be 15th century made).
The Fallopian tubes were not described in writing until the beginning of the 17th century by students of Gabriel Falopio who published his lectures. We can conclude that he was teaching about the tubes in the first half of the 16th century (when he lived). There is a possibility he was not the first one to teach about the tubes (since they always have been there), but so far there is no evidence about it. Even Leonardo da Vinci did not draw the Fallopian tubes. My impression is that the knowledge about them went mainstream in the 16th century.
The idea that these are the ovaries and the Fallopian tubes and sperm (first observed at the end of 17th century) is the only thing in the VMs that keeps my mind open about the possibility of the VMs being a forgery.
Few people independently recognized the figure in the middle as representation of Cassiopeia being tied (I think Koen had a thread about that). I agree with them - it seems like a possibility.
What does Casiopea have to do with the women's reproductive organs? I have no idea.
All these are subjective interpretations. At the end, the picture may have nothing to do with shoulder bones, or ovaries, or sperm, or Cassiopeia. Who knows! It is an interesting picture and I haven't made my mind about it.
EllieV > 24-10-2016, 10:19 PM
-JKP- > 24-10-2016, 11:02 PM
VViews > 25-10-2016, 09:55 AM
EllieV > 25-10-2016, 12:22 PM