Posts: 934Threads: 41
Member details
Posts: 934
Threads: 41
Thanks Received: 555 in 345 posts
Thanks Given: 67
Joined: Sep 2021
Reputation:
0
Location: Poland
Statistics of verbose cipher may be whatever. If you replace one letter with several letters and have several variants for a single letter or you have big chunks of null text with signal hidden among them they you can arrange it all quite freely
Posts: 14Threads: 3
Member details
Posts: 14
Threads: 3
Thanks Received: 6 in 4 posts
Thanks Given: 82
Joined: Jul 2026
Reputation:
0
Location: America
chenxiang you may be right in your comparison to Ramanujan. It could be possible the one behind the tome was, like Ramanujan, one of those once-in-a-life arch geniuses who came up with the entire theorem and content behind the book. I looked up Ramanujan once I read your post on comparing him to the still-unknown mind behind the text. Initially skimming the Wiki article I thought he was just a savant. But as I went deeper I had to admit he was up there with the likes of my grandpa, my bio grandma, Einstein and von Neumann, all geniuses in their fields involving mathematics. And I think the one who came up with the content was like them, a person who saw the world in a different way. Honestly I think if my grandpa knew of the Voynich manuscript he might have contributed his own work based on his research into the usage of mathematics in astronomy to pinpoint the potential mind.