ololololo > 28-06-2026, 08:30 PM
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 06:33 AM
(28-06-2026, 08:30 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.1). The colors are the same (only blue)Maybe there was no so much color to work with or they had to be concidencially blue? From the perspective of your theory i think it is a good factor to consider.
(28-06-2026, 08:30 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.in general, it seems that the right diagram is the left diagram "enlarged" by two times.Ah, like a Zoom In. Very interesting! I am lost on how to approach this, good stuff.
(28-06-2026, 08:30 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.They have a few common words: oteey, chey, dal, and dal is in approximately the same position.Very little incidence to be cribs i think, there should have been more. BUT in the voynich context this is like a crib, i was not expeciting to see repeated words. Very interesting.
(28-06-2026, 08:30 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.A less obvious example is f69r-f69v, but here there is a decrease.Maybe it was supposed to have the exact number but it made a mistake, the other posibility in this idea is that something changes when zooming in?
ololololo > 29-06-2026, 09:52 AM
(29-06-2026, 06:33 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Maybe there was no so much color to work with or they had to be concidencially blue?I really think so. Given that the overall style of the book is "substandarted" (compared to other manuscripts, it seems simpler and more minimalistic in design), this seems plausible. On f69, you can see that the author also uses green. This suggests that he had an abundance of green (presumably for plants) and blue (which is used extensively).
(29-06-2026, 06:33 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Very little incidence to be cribs i think, there should have been more.These words are also found in other charts, so they may not mean anything in our case.
(29-06-2026, 06:33 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.the other posibility in this idea is that something changes when zooming in?It is unclear how these changes manifest themselves. I could not find any connection other than the superficial resemblance. I also don't understand how the rays are distributed on f69r.
(29-06-2026, 06:33 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Maybe the reason why the zoom out have 28 "tubes" and the zoom in has 45 "tubes" is because the zoom out was just a figurative drawing and the real number of lines was the zoom in version. Or the Zoom out has the categories and the zoom in as the sub categories or something like that.Everything is possible
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 10:20 AM
(29-06-2026, 09:52 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I also don't understand how the rays are distributed on f69r.Yup. And why the drawer didn't use a rule or something to draw straight lines, it is a pain to me trying to predict its intention.
(29-06-2026, 09:52 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Everything is possibleyea, i went for a tangent there huha. Is like a deduction based on an idea and then one makes another deduction that gets farther and farther into fantasy land, maybe is better not to navigate that far away. But it is Fun, is a guilty pleasure in a way.
ololololo > 29-06-2026, 10:48 AM
(29-06-2026, 10:20 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yup. And why the drawer didn't use a rule or something to draw straight lines, it is a pain to me trying to predict its intention.Perhaps he was too focused on the upper "bumps" of this figure. However, he used a pair of compasses to draw a circle around a star.
Jorge_Stolfi > 29-06-2026, 01:53 PM
(29-06-2026, 10:48 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Perhaps he was too focused on the upper "bumps" of this figure. However, he used a pair of compasses to draw a circle around a star.
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 09:20 PM
(29-06-2026, 01:53 PM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Maybe there were such sketches but they were erased or faded away.
(29-06-2026, 10:48 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Perhaps he was too focused on the upper "bumps" of this figure. However, he used a pair of compasses to draw a circle around a star.Yea, and it looks to me some of the lines are made with a rule of some type. Maybe she/he wanted to do it faster and discarded the rule, lack of patience, maybe there was a time frame to finish the diagram or just desperation to finish it.