I have been looking at the poses of the nymphs in the zodiac section, but not those in the bio section.
This was around '99 when I was trying to figure out if and how the zodiac illustrations really refer to
celestial events (paranatellonta). For each degree, there could be any of the following:
- a star rising with this degree of the zodiac (the litteral meaning of paranatellonta)
- a star culminating when this degree rises
- a start setting when this degree rises (or sets)
- it is the longitude of the star.
The idea was whether the pose of the nymph would identify which of the several options it was....
At the time I concentrated more on the stars and their magnitudes (which I supposed to be reflected in the number of points of the star held by each nymph) than the poses, and intended to use it as a check in case I found a good match.
Of course, I never found a good match, except a qualitative one. The distribution of the magnitudes could be explained, but not the exact locations of the brightest stars. Thus I never got round to doing the check.
While all this may seem far-fetched, like a long shot, there is actually some sort of a precedent, namely the illustration I show here:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
These 'nymphs' have poses like in the Voynich MS, and these are related to some celestial event. Of course, there's only one per month. The colour of the nymph refers to day or night, as also reflected in the 'label text' in the next outer ring, which has a capital 'Nu' for night and a capital 'Mu' for day.
If the nymphs in the bio section tend to have the same restricted set of poses as in the zodiac, then this idea becomes much less likely (should I say: even more unlikely....)