(5 hours ago)JoJo_Jost Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Who here is still honestly and consistently working on a plausible solution? And in what direction is it heading?
Well, I do.
But I am not going to publish every little step (here).
„VMS research“ allows itself a blind spot at the size of half Europe.
I think it is asking all the wrong questions since 1912;
some of the better questions are:
- VMS characters are a „given“/designed alphabet — where in Europe was it necessary and possible to create an alphabet from scrap? (there were some places)
- VMS ˋvords´are starting to 95% with 1 character from a small set of not more than 8 characters, and are ending with 1 out of 5-6 in the very most cases — which languages do show the same limits? (there are some)
- whatever VMS vowels are, there seem not more than 2-3 of them to be preferred (counted on the appearance distributions), while others are rare — which natural languages do have similar features? (there are some)
- which are the distinct letters of VMS alphabet, and how many are they? (there are more than 13…) — which languages to have a reduced character set due to their structure or historical reasons? (there are some)
- is it a boring „predictability“ in VMS‘ character sequences — or are these vowel harmonies of natural languages? (there are some)
- is it possible to trace back such details for 600 years? (that‘s a good one)
At all, I would not expect now that the „plants“ will be explained anyhow by their accompanying texts, or will have anything to do with them. There is chance of „just being decoration“, at least those drawings were not very helpful the last 114 years.
Other parts of imagery seem to be more helpful.