DG97EEB > Yesterday, 08:28 AM
(Yesterday, 08:25 AM)Radim Dobeš Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But it always did. I'm not dismissing your particular hypothesis. I'm saying that there are some established methods. You're talking to Diane O'Donovan a lot who is an art historian. She can tell you how to proceed.(Yesterday, 08:17 AM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The problem is here are 10s of thousands of images that "match". I'm not expert, but from everything I've read on art history, that's just not how it works...The burden of proof is significant and doesn't rest on superficial exemplars.And what if these pictures also coincide with a certain text, go one after the other as in the text and even on many pages in a row. As I already wrote, it will take several years before they stop solving recipes and herbs and baths. Plants are just another layer of code to make it look like a plant at first glance. But thank you for the answers, it is valuable knowledge for me how scientific research and professional science work. I understand that accepting a hypothesis nowadays requires a lot of persuasion and evidence.
PatrickZ > 9 hours ago
(Yesterday, 08:05 AM)Radim Dobeš Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'll just try a little experiment and put some pictures in here. If this is not evidence for any theory other than balneological, then we'll never move forward and we can call it whatever we want. I don't need to be right, I'd like the decipherment to move forward.