eggyk > 28-03-2026, 01:47 PM
Koen G > 28-03-2026, 02:07 PM
(28-03-2026, 01:47 PM)eggyk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Or perhaps a cutout from somewhere else attached to the parchment makes sense, like an old wax seal collection
eggyk > 28-03-2026, 02:50 PM
Fabrizio Salani > 28-03-2026, 06:23 PM
(28-03-2026, 01:47 PM)eggyk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So if I understand correctly, the wax wasn't applied directly to the parchment, but rather a cardboard material in between. Is the glue between the wax and the cardboard, or is the glue between the cardboard and the parchment?This is the right sequence: treated parchment, glue, cardboard, seal.
I don't understand why glue would be required to stamp a seal onto parchment. Is the idea that a piece of cardboard was glued to the parchment, and then hot wax was carefully poured onto that cutout, and then the imprint made? Perhaps that is normal, I don't know.
Or perhaps a cutout from somewhere else attached to the parchment makes sense, like an old wax seal collection:
Bernd > 28-03-2026, 06:48 PM
Fabrizio Salani > 28-03-2026, 09:08 PM
(28-03-2026, 06:48 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Wat would be a legit reason for cutting out a wax seal and gluing it to another document? Doesn't that invalidate the point of a seal? It's like cutting out a signature and gluing it onto another document.No, indeed, the affixing procedure is correct: the parchment onto which the cardboard ribbon to close the package is glued (but it could also have been silk or cotton) and above it the corroboration seal to secure everything. I forgot, in the trace of the "to loose" seal underneath, typical of Roman "litterae clausae," there is no trace of glue, only the oil from the sealing wax and traces of the wax itself.
Fabrizio Salani > 28-03-2026, 09:12 PM
Koen G > 28-03-2026, 09:21 PM
Fabrizio Salani > 28-03-2026, 09:55 PM