Koen G > 25-03-2026, 10:44 PM
ReneZ > 26-03-2026, 08:21 AM
eggyk > 26-03-2026, 08:33 AM
Fabrizio Salani > 26-03-2026, 08:38 AM
(26-03-2026, 08:33 AM)eggyk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote="ReneZ" pid='81950' dateline='1774509702']This makes me think that they are not "all" his inventions, but a pre-existing collection with the addition, perhaps, of his own variations.
È certo che quelli in alto siano AG e non AC?
[/citazione]
Sì, nell'originale è etichettato come AG (e presentato in sequenza dopo AF). Anche AC è simile.
[/citazione]
The strange thing is that, from what I see in the book according to Renoir, it could also be GA as for the "G" section the first combination starts from "GG"
[quote="Fabrizio Salani" pid='81954' dateline='1774510713']
[quote="eggyk" pid='81953' dateline='1774510418']
[quote="ReneZ" pid='81950' dateline='1774509702']
È certo che quelli in alto siano AG e non AC?
[/citazione]
Sì, nell'originale è etichettato come AG (e presentato in sequenza dopo AF). Anche AC è simile.
[/citazione]
The strange thing is that, from what I see in the book according to Renoir, it could also be GA as for the "G" section the first combination starts from "GG"
eggyk > 26-03-2026, 08:55 AM
(26-03-2026, 08:38 AM)Fabrizio Salani Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The strange thing is that, from what I see in the book according to Renoir, it could also be GA as for the "G" section the first combination starts from "GG"
(26-03-2026, 08:38 AM)Fabrizio Salani Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This makes me think that they are not "all" his inventions, but a pre-existing collection with the addition, perhaps, of his own variations.
Fabrizio Salani > 26-03-2026, 09:07 AM

Fabrizio Salani > 26-03-2026, 09:11 AM
(26-03-2026, 09:07 AM)Fabrizio Salani Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.... With the opening of this discussion section, dedicated only to the seal, I return to my interest in the parchment....
It's just a curiosity and my opinion. Based on what the sphragistics experts at the State Archives told me, namely that it could have been made with a pendant or a ring, I assume it was a ring on the right or, more likely, left middle finger. Because: if you imprint a manual stamp (with a handle or pendant), you look at it to understand the correct direction of pressure, while you don't do this with a ring, because the direction is always the one of the finger. Let's imagine the parchment rotated with the long side, the one with the seal, towards us and we imprint the seal with our fist. I noticed that, in any case, a slight twist to the right of the right fist naturally occurs, and an even greater one with the left, but the seal shows greater pressure on the upper/left part (which has detached over time) than on the lower/right part, and this makes me think of the left hand applying more force upwards. Obviously, I'm thinking as a right-handed person and without physical proof, only virtual!
Jorge_Stolfi > 27-03-2026, 07:27 AM
(26-03-2026, 09:07 AM)Fabrizio Salani Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.it could have been made with a pendant or a ring
Stefan Wirtz_2 > 27-03-2026, 02:10 PM
Koen G > 27-03-2026, 02:22 PM