Hi everyone,
For over a century, linguists and cryptographers have failed to translate the Voynich Manuscript. I am proposing that they have failed because they are making a category error: they are trying to read a Machine Output as if it were a natural language. Full academic paper: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
I have developed a method that reverse-engineers the manuscript not as a text, but as the result of a 15th-century mechanical device.
Here is why this is the only explanation that fits the data:
1. Proof It Is Not a "Story" (The Jaccard Anomaly) You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
If you write a story, you naturally connect sentences. If line 1 is about a "cat," line 2 usually mentions "it" or "meow." In statistics, we measure this connection using the Jaccard Similarity Index. Normal Language: Has a score of roughly 0.35. Words flow and repeat naturally to build context.
The Voynich Manuscript: Has a score of 0.02. almost 0.
What does this mean? It means the "author" of the Voynich Manuscript had total amnesia after every single line. There is zero narrative connection between lines. This is impossible for a human writing a story.
2. The Code Structure: The PRS Formula
If you look closely at the Voynich text, you will see that
every single "word" follows a rigid, unbreakable structure. In my research, I call this the PRS Architecture:
[Prefix] + [Root] + [Suffix]
Think of it like a slot machine with three wheels. You cannot put the third wheel first. The structure is physically locked.
Prefix (The Action): e.g., qo- (Instrumental use / "Use tool")
Root (The Material): e.g., -ke- (Heat / Thermal)
Suffix (The State): e.g., -dy (Measurement / Dose)
Example: The common word qokedy is not a random word. It is a constructed command: qo (Action) + ke (Heat) + dy (Measure) = "Measure the application of heat." These meanings are taken solely and exclusively from Cappelli's Latin abbreviations: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
This rule holds true across the entire manuscript. Natural languages are flexible; the Voynich Manuscript is rigid.
3. The Only Explanation: The "Syntaxis Volvella"
How do we explain a text that has no memory (Jaccard Anomaly) and a rigid 3-part structure (PRS)?
The text was generated by a Volvelle (a Cipher Wheel) You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
We know these devices existed in the 15th century (like the Alberti Disk). My theory posits that the scribe was not "writing" in a creative sense. He was an industrial operator observing a chemical process.
The Workflow:
1. Event: The operator sees the liquid boiling.
2. Encryption: He uses the device (The Volvelle). He aligns the Action Ring to "Process," the Root Ring to "Heat," and the State Ring to "Measure."
3. Output: He writes down the resulting string: qokedy.
This explains why there are no corrections in the entire book. You don't "edit" a logbook entry generated by a machine; you just spin the wheel and write the next data point.
Conclusion The Voynich Manuscript a chemical and pharmaceutical database encrypted via a mechanical Volvella.