Rafal > 27-01-2026, 02:03 PM
But the scribe never does it in Voynich Manuscript.oshfdk > 27-01-2026, 02:39 PM
nablator > 27-01-2026, 03:52 PM
(27-01-2026, 02:39 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On the other hand, if we treat the manuscript as a faithful rendering of an unknown language in an invented script, this lack of cribs seems to require some explanation.
Rafal > 27-01-2026, 03:56 PM
Quote:If it is a one to many cipher, where a plaintext word can have many possible encodings
![[Image: ucry_a_1901797_f0002_c.jpg]](https://www.tandfonline.com/cms/asset/0dfe3425-ad22-4649-a480-bcd46ddb78fa/ucry_a_1901797_f0002_c.jpg)
Jorge_Stolfi > 27-01-2026, 04:10 PM
(27-01-2026, 02:03 PM)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The weird thing about Voynichese it that it doesn't have any obvious cribs and is different in this from other manuscripts.
Rafal > 27-01-2026, 04:19 PM

Gibberish manuscript is still very weird but for me it is less weird than other options. I will try to develop these ideas in the future.
oshfdk > 27-01-2026, 04:31 PM
(27-01-2026, 03:56 PM)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.2) Polyalphabetic cipher on the other hand may use the same amount of symbols or fewer than the alphabet but symbols have different meaning depending on their context. It is actually "many to many" cipher and not "one to many". An example would be Vigenere cipher: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Rafal > 27-01-2026, 04:35 PM
Quote:You mean, different from other cipher manuscripts...
Rafal > 27-01-2026, 04:46 PM
Quote:I'm not sure I use the proper terminology, but for me "many to many" implies that you cannot reconstruct a unique plaintext, there will always be uncertainty
Jorge_Stolfi > 27-01-2026, 05:31 PM
(27-01-2026, 04:19 PM)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And going back to the lack of cribs I can see some other possibilities: