Hello everyone,
I would like to share a recently completed research project on the Voynich Manuscript (Beinecke MS 408), now formally published with DOI, which proposes a non-linguistic, functional reconstruction of the manuscript as a modular medical system rather than a narrative or literary text.
The central hypothesis of the study is that the Voynich Manuscript operates as a 15th-century professional vademecum: a structured expert system integrating diagnosis, materia medica, and therapeutic protocols. Instead of pursuing phonetic or linguistic decipherment, the research focuses on structural engineering, internal consistency, and functional correlations between the manuscript’s sections.
The analysis treats the manuscript as an operational system in which different sections interact through a defined workflow, rather than as isolated or symbolic components.
Key contributions of the study include:
• Identification of a relational workflow linking diagnosis (zodiacal and anatomical sections), ingredients (herbal folios), and preparation/execution protocols (recipe section).
• Proposal of a binary pharmaceutical code based on recurring stars, containers, and humoral logic (hot/dry vs. cold/wet), consistently applied across multiple sections.
• Evidence for rigid syntactic templates in the recipe text, supporting the interpretation of the script as technical notation or procedural encoding rather than natural language prose.
• Functional reconstruction of the final recipe section (folios 103r–116v), organized according to the medieval anatomical principle
a capite ad calcem, and consistent with contemporary medical traditions such as Salernitan humoral theory.
The full research is openly available here:
DOI: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Figshare (open access): You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
In addition, I have prepared a short explanatory video that summarizes the methodology and main structural findings. This video is intended solely as a visual aid to the published paper, not as a substitute for the formal analysis.
I am sharing this work here for critical discussion and feedback, particularly regarding the proposed structural model, its internal consistency, and its compatibility with known late-medieval medical and pharmacological practices.
Best regards,
Juanan