Anton > 31-03-2016, 11:48 AM
Quote:However not for the three pharma bifolios, judging from the containers.
Sam G > 31-03-2016, 11:52 AM
ReneZ > 31-03-2016, 12:02 PM
(31-03-2016, 11:52 AM)Sam G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Sure. To be clear, I think that the the bifolios were intended to form a bound book, I just don't think they were intended to be nested within one another.
Koen G > 31-03-2016, 12:05 PM
VViews > 31-03-2016, 03:43 PM
MarcoP > 31-03-2016, 04:11 PM
(31-03-2016, 03:43 PM)VViews Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I am looking at these folios again and I must say that the 76-83 foldout is a problem for me.
I fail to see any internal coherency within this bifolio at all, whereas 83r ties in quite nicely with 82v (the "rainbow"-like tubes theme) which precedes it, both in the current foliation order and in the reordering proposed in the Reordering task subforum.
Sam G > 31-03-2016, 04:21 PM
VViews > 31-03-2016, 05:50 PM
david > 31-03-2016, 06:32 PM
Sam G > 31-03-2016, 08:58 PM