R. Sale > 01-11-2025, 03:41 AM
Kaybo > 01-11-2025, 01:46 PM
(01-11-2025, 03:41 AM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The VMs 'critter' has had a number of potential interpretations and pangolin has certainly been one of them. There are, however, several problems with that identification. First, it is generally considered that the scales are on backwards and the long, flat tail is missing, *if* it is a pangolin.
More importantly, in addition to the 'critter' itself, there are two other artistic elements directly beneath it. The first of these is a nebuly line. As demonstrated in the VMs cosmos, the VMs artist knew the standard, medieval use of a nebuly line as a wolkenband (cloud band) and as a cosmic boundary, often found in religious imagery as a separation between the mundane and the divine. Why would a pangolin be associated with a cosmic boundary and what are all the little dashed markings below the nebuly line?
The answer is found in BNF Fr. 13096 f. 18. The critter associated with a cosmic boundary is the Agnus Dei and the dashed markings are the droplets of blood. Furthermore, the structural sequence with the lamb on one side of the cosmic boundary and the droplets of blood on the other side has only been shown in this historical illustration. Although produced in 1313, provenance indicates this manuscript was later in the library of the Dukes of Burgundy.
Mauro > 01-11-2025, 08:50 PM
(01-11-2025, 01:46 PM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.More context to African journey theory:
There are nearly no books left from the time of Henry the navigator today.
But in later books that mention the early roteiros it was always talked about books that were unreadable anymore, corrupted and therefore useless.
We have at least two sources that stated that:
„Crónica dos feitos da Guiné“ (Gomes Eanes de Zurara, ca. 1453)
"Décadas da Ásia“ (João de Barros ca 1552)
Kaybo > 02-11-2025, 12:05 AM
(01-11-2025, 08:50 PM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(01-11-2025, 01:46 PM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.More context to African journey theory:
There are nearly no books left from the time of Henry the navigator today.
But in later books that mention the early roteiros it was always talked about books that were unreadable anymore, corrupted and therefore useless.
We have at least two sources that stated that:
„Crónica dos feitos da Guiné“ (Gomes Eanes de Zurara, ca. 1453)
"Décadas da Ásia“ (João de Barros ca 1552)
If those works are available online, can you please post a link, and a quote of the passages which support what you say? If they are not available online, can you please post at least the quotes? And a translation of the passages would be useful too.
Don't ask us to find and read two books in Renaissance Portuguese to be able to check, please. As it stands, what you affirm is little more than an argument from authority which almost noone can vet (I surely cannot), so it has a value of about zero. With proper links and quotes that might change.
Bluetoes101 > 02-11-2025, 12:19 AM
(01-11-2025, 02:43 AM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(01-11-2025, 12:32 AM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I do joke with potential solvers sometimes "numbers!", as for some reason they think anything that can work must be right. List of numbers then..
There's no reason its not really, it would just be weird and probably not advance us in understanding (or be provable). Also as you say, if it is a cipher that uses a look-up book.. we are likely doomed without the book.
On the general line of thinking though, which seems to be reductionist, I think you may find this worthwhile to read - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. It's at least good food for thought.
I tried to understand some parts of the text in your link, but I think if it is a rule...why there are exceptions? But its the same with the cz (ch), sometimes the writer puts a dot (or something) on top of it and sometimes not.
Kaybo > 02-11-2025, 01:08 AM
(02-11-2025, 12:19 AM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(01-11-2025, 02:43 AM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(01-11-2025, 12:32 AM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I do joke with potential solvers sometimes "numbers!", as for some reason they think anything that can work must be right. List of numbers then..
There's no reason its not really, it would just be weird and probably not advance us in understanding (or be provable). Also as you say, if it is a cipher that uses a look-up book.. we are likely doomed without the book.
On the general line of thinking though, which seems to be reductionist, I think you may find this worthwhile to read - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. It's at least good food for thought.
I tried to understand some parts of the text in your link, but I think if it is a rule...why there are exceptions? But its the same with the cz (ch), sometimes the writer puts a dot (or something) on top of it and sometimes not.
If it was right, we wouldn't still be here talking about the mystery of the VM. But there is a lot to be learned from what has not succeeded so far.
If I could give any advice to newer people, it would be to learn from what has been done so far because years of knowledge can be absorbed in a night or two even if it seems flawed.
Bluetoes101 > 02-11-2025, 01:25 AM
Kaybo > 02-11-2025, 10:13 PM
nablator > 02-11-2025, 10:25 PM
(02-11-2025, 10:13 PM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't wont to complain, but why the copy and paste function is inactive. That makes it really hard to use the site. Also, is there away to attache files in the replies?
rikforto > 03-11-2025, 12:43 AM
(01-11-2025, 01:46 PM)Kaybo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.All paintings are not 100% correct and more of a symbolic nature. They are painted from descriptions or from sketches that maybe only contain parts of the plants and the rest was made up. That is what you would expect from the first travel books to Africa at that time. Systematic paintings start a lot later, around 1500.