quimqu > 23-10-2025, 06:03 PM
(23-10-2025, 05:45 PM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My theory is that the Author had the text for the herbal but at most only a sketch of some parts of some of the plants. Thus he asked the Scribe to make up all the missing plants and parts, and gave him a bunch of those "alchemical" herbals to use as crib. (By the way it is unfortunate that the name "alchemical" has stuck. I don't see much connection to alchemy. "Fantastic herbals" may have been a better name...)
Mauro > 23-10-2025, 06:24 PM
(23-10-2025, 02:53 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.His [Toresella] text about VMS is (without something About Rudolph etc.):
"Il codice è di difficile datazione ma la più parte degli studiosi pensano che risalga agli anni 1460-1480. Queste piante fantastice non Hanno relazione alcuna con quelle die soliti erbari degli alchimisti; alcuni botanici però vi Hanno riconosciuto il Peperone e persino il girasole.; altri vi Hanno scoperto meraviglie anche più sorprendenti.[etc. ect.]
ReneZ > 24-10-2025, 12:51 AM
(23-10-2025, 02:53 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think you are trying to say that "experts" are better in recognizing things like that little blue guy as an elephant, as experts have quite more experience in identifying items that are out of size, colours, shape, even behaviour and expected surroundings, than us laymen and amateurs.
ReneZ > 24-10-2025, 01:00 AM
(23-10-2025, 06:24 PM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(23-10-2025, 02:53 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.His [Toresella] text about VMS is (without something About Rudolph etc.):
"Il codice è di difficile datazione ma la più parte degli studiosi pensano che risalga agli anni 1460-1480. Queste piante fantastice non Hanno relazione alcuna con quelle die soliti erbari degli alchimisti; alcuni botanici però vi Hanno riconosciuto il Peperone e persino il girasole.; altri vi Hanno scoperto meraviglie anche più sorprendenti.[etc. ect.]
I'm just curious, where does that text come from? Any link? I ask because there are a lot of orthography errors in the italian text and I wonder why.
Jorge_Stolfi > 24-10-2025, 03:46 AM
Jorge_Stolfi > 24-10-2025, 04:02 AM
(23-10-2025, 06:03 PM)quimqu Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you think that the text describes the plant and the scriba drawn it according to the text? Or that the description was given apart (in another text or oraly)? I think also that the plants were drawn from a text and that's why they look so weird
Aga Tentakulus > 24-10-2025, 06:34 AM
Stefan Wirtz_2 > 24-10-2025, 10:20 PM
(23-10-2025, 06:24 PM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm just curious, where does that text come from? Any link? I ask because there are a lot of orthography errors in the italian text and I wonder why.I had to type the text by hand, and as I am German, my editor made some autocorrections into "German" after typing, i.e. several changes to capital letters,
Stefan Wirtz_2 > 26-10-2025, 08:28 PM
(24-10-2025, 12:51 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[..]I said and cited that Toresella is saying nothing but a romantic fantasy about the Voynich Manuscript - the stuff about sunflowers and Andromeda galaxy didn‘t age well during the last years, but these were not his ideas.
If I may summarise the long argument of your post:
You argued that there are only 3 Italian aspects in the MS, namely the ghibbeline merlons on some buildings, and they are only recognised by amateurs.
I argued that many experts recognise Itialian influences in several aspects of the MS. One of these is Toresella.
You say that Toresella is completely wrong.
That does not invalidate my argument. And he is not an amateur.
Petrasti > 05-11-2025, 11:31 PM