anyasophira > 07-09-2025, 11:14 PM
Stefan Wirtz_2 > 08-09-2025, 03:18 PM
Koen G > 08-09-2025, 03:35 PM
anyasophira > 09-09-2025, 02:37 AM
(08-09-2025, 03:35 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is a good question, and it touches on two frustrating (but hard to fix) points Voynich researchers have to deal with:I used to follow a now defunct blog that listed newly digitized illuminated manuscripts from one particular library (I don't remember the details). Going through those ended up building frustrations though, because it turns out the vast majority of manuscripts just aren't interesting to us. So I think it's better to search with purpose.
- It's hard to figure out what's been written about a certain topic/MS before.
- The various online manuscript repositories and their browsers are a nightmare to navigate (how I wish they'd push for a shared standard).
Additionally, we can't always assume that "known" manuscripts have been looked at from the angle you'llbe looking at them. Maybe you're interested in handwriting, but manuscript x has only been studied for its imagery.
Often, finding the right manuscripts involves a bit of luck, and maybe hours of search time. There may be shortcuts, but those are all case-dependent. It would indeed be interesting if we knew when and where new herbal manuscripts were digitized, but I have no idea how we could find out.
About the em-dashes, don't worry. A dash doth not a chatbot make
anyasophira > 09-09-2025, 02:46 AM
(08-09-2025, 03:18 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don 't get even the whole questions at all.Well my question wasn’t based on the premise that I was a few clicks away from finding a manuscript “Rosetta Stone”.
You are asking for a kind of level or catalogue of which medieval manuscripts were already somehow "browsed" by all partipiciants of this forum here?
Why?
This is surely not done by "the swarm" systematically. Just a few people did this maybe category-wise, most are just picking 1 or 2 similiar pictures from the internet to "proove" their own theories -- which are never shared by anyone else.
I would not even suggest to watch (and believe) all Voynich Talk videos.
Voynich Manuscript shows just very few references to other scripts (beginning from this alphabet), nearly no religious symbols, but lots of vague similarities that are quite misleading.
Personally I doubt the chance of finding any "full-explaining" other script which is just waiting in some library for it's discovery -- it is better to stick to these few real-world references recognized already, but this does not mean VMS is a crazy fairytale book: we just do not know the signs given within it.
ReneZ > 09-09-2025, 04:23 AM
MarcoP > 09-09-2025, 04:31 PM
bi3mw > 09-09-2025, 08:07 PM
Stefan Wirtz_2 > 09-09-2025, 09:12 PM
(09-09-2025, 02:46 AM)anyasophira Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well my question wasn’t based on the premise that I was a few clicks away from finding a manuscript “Rosetta Stone”.
[..]
anyasophira > 10-09-2025, 12:15 AM
(09-09-2025, 09:12 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(09-09-2025, 02:46 AM)anyasophira Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well my question wasn’t based on the premise that I was a few clicks away from finding a manuscript “Rosetta Stone”.
[..]
Funny thing: that is the best hope one can have about VMS...
The author(s) showed some very few tendencies to use inspirations (or rather flat copies) from other books.
In best case there is a just-copied manuscript page somewhere in this world, helping to explain it's counterpart in VMS.